CAN RON UNZ BE TRUSTED?

Ron Unz Seems To Have No Scruples About Lying.

The following comment about Ron Unz is in the last paragraph in the Nov 24,1997 issue of "US News & World Report" (article attached below):
 -----

Quote from US News & World Report (Nov 24, 2997):

"Unz knows the value of a good attention-getter. Although he was working on a Ph.D. in theoretical physics, when Unz applied for his first summer job on Wall Street several years ago he was concerned about how his résumé would play, since he had no financial experience. So he inflated his IQ, listing it as 214 on the Stanford-Binet scale--way beyond genius range.”

'I was applying for a job for which I had no experience and I needed a hook,'says Unz, whose political aspirations may land him in a similar predicament again. With bilingual education, he may have found a new hook."

-------

Ron Unz's use of a lie as a "hook" to get employment is more than a "little white lie." Ron was seeking employment and in most companies to knowingly lie is grounds for getting fired. (In most companies there are usually very specific clauses that lying on the résumé or application for employment is grounds for termination.)

As you can all see, Ron Unz does not seem to have scruples about using lies to further his agenda.

This aspect of Ron Unz's character is not insignificant. How can anyone trust what Unz is saying? If he is willing to lie about his own qualifications, he can distort any figures he wants without any qualms.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/971124/24bil.htm

US News & World Report:
Nov 24, 1997

Is it hasta la vista for bilingual ed?

With Latino support, California seems poised to kill the controversial
approach

Check out the Citizen's Toolbox on Bilingual Education

BY BETSY STREISAND

LOS ANGELES--First, California voters did away with benefits to illegal immigrants. Then they got rid of affirmative action. Now, in what is rapidly emerging as the brand-name ballot issue for 1998, bilingual education may meet its end. Last week, petitions were filed for  English for the Children, a ballot measure sponsored by Silicon Valley millionaire Ron Unz that would virtually eliminate bilingual education in California ...

By getting influential Hispanics like Escalante signed on early, Unz hopes he has positioned the initiative so it can keep Latino support in the coming months.

Unz knows the value of a good attention-getter. Although he was working on a Ph.D. in theoretical physics, when Unz applied for his first summer job on Wall Street several years ago he was concerned about how his résumé would play, since he had no financial experience. So he inflated his IQ, listing it as 214 on the Stanford-Binet scale--way beyond genius range.

"I was applying for a job for which I had no experience and I needed a hook," says Unz, whose political aspirations may land him in a similar predicament again. With bilingual education, he may have found a new hook.

---------------------------------------

ANOTHER INCIDENT

On October 26, 2000 in Tempe, Arizona in a room filled to capacity at the ASU Law School today (October 26), in response to pro-bilingual Jeff MacSwan’s point that.. "Ron Unz promised to teach children English in a year, but after two years of his one year immersion program, only 5 percent of English learners could pass English proficiency tests statewide," said Jeff MacSwan, assistant professor of education at ASU, who debated Ron Unz and Margaret Dugan along with Sal Gabaldon, a Tucson educator, earlier today. 

"Redesignation rates are meaningless. I've always said that," responded Unz. 

However, even today the statistic can be found on the front page of Unz's website www.onenation.org. And he used the redesignation rate to criticize California's successful bilingual programs in every campaign speech during his struggle to crush bilingual programs in that state.

In the Los Angeles Times on Oct. 19, 1997 Ron Unz wrote an article where he mentions the English proficiency redesignation rate of bilingual education:

“Of the 1.3 million California schoolchildren--a quarter of our state's total public school enrollment--who begin each year classified as not knowing English, only about 5% learn English by year's end, implying an annual failure rate of 95% for existing programs.” (Bilingualism vs. Bilingual Education, RON K. UNZ, Los Angeles Times, October 19, 1997, p.M6 )

As you can see, Ron Unz seems to readily change his story and -- there is no polite way of saying it -- he tells outright lies when it seems convenient.

If Ron is willing to lie about his own qualifications, and about what he has previously stated, then how can anyone trust ANYTHING that Ron Unz is saying?