Mar. 9, 2005
Would declare official tongue
Elvia Díaz
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0309English-only09.html
Sharply divided along party lines, the House of Representatives tentatively endorsed a referendum to declare English as the state's official language and require government workers to carry out their official duties in English.
House Concurrent Resolution 2030 faces a final vote in that chamber before it goes to the Senate. If approved, the measure would go on the November 2006 ballot.
Republican Rep. Russell Pearce of Mesa, the
main sponsor, hailed the measure as necessary to
save thousands of dollars the state government
spends annually printing documents in Spanish
and other languages.
"This is no attempt to diminish the culture of
folks who speak many other languages," Pearce
said. "We're an English-speaking nation. The
official record should be in English."
Democrats criticized the measure as
unconstitutional and unfair.
"Nobody is trying to replace English or any
other language," said Rep. Pete Rios, D-Hayden.
"But people should keep in mind that we share a
border with Mexico. Are we constantly infused
with the Spanish language? Absolutely. Is there
anything wrong with that? I don't think so."
Under the measure, documents necessary for
international trade, for tourism and to protect
the public's health and safety would not be
affected.
Spanish-language documents printed by prison and
health officials including immunization,
childhood lead poisoning prevention, sexually
transmitted diseases, prison orientation
handbooks and sanitation signs could be
exempted.
Similarly, it would not affect people conducting
private business.
Documents produced in Spanish such as lottery
advertising, automobile insurance premium
comparisons and the Spanish-language fliers
Phoenix attached to 696 water bills at the
request of residents would be banned. Phoenix
has 428,626 water users, city officials said.
On Tuesday, Pearce successfully changed the
measure to include that election ballots be
printed only in English. Democrats challenged
the constitutionality of such an amendment.
Rep. Steve Gallardo, D-Phoenix, argued that
printing ballots only in English violates the
requirements of the federal Voting Rights Act.
Pearce rejected that notion.
He has said his measure would not face the same
fate of the English-only law Arizona voters
narrowly approved in 1988. The state Supreme
Court declared it unconstitutional because it
violated free-speech and equal-protection
rights. The new proposal is different, Pearce
has said, because it doesn't prevent anyone from
speaking or learning any language they want.