English
learners' education held back
CONTRA COSTA TIMES
February 21, 2006
Shirley Dang
High school senior Aksonexay Ratanasith arrived in the United States from
war-torn Laos at age 3.
The
Richmond boy excelled in elementary school, but in junior high was placed in
classes with recent immigrants. He scored well on fluency tests, he said,
but remained in English development classes until his sophomore year at
Kennedy High School.
Now a
senior, he takes database applications and leadership class. He still
doesn't understand why he wasn't allowed out of the English learner program
sooner.
"E! LD
was holding me back," Ratanasith said.
For the
past two years, nearly half of the state's 1.3 million English language
learners have tested fluent on state exams, but less than 10 percent made
their way to mainstream classes, according to the state Department of
Education.
The
reason: State policies encourage districts to keep students in
English-learner programs rather than reclassify them, according to
recent studies by the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California,
the Legislative Analyst's Office and the Bureau of State Audits.
Schools receive more money for students who speak a primary language
other than English. Federal laws demand that English learners score
increasingly higher on standardized tests over time, meaning districts
that keep high-achieving students from leaving the program are more !
likely to clear those hurdles.
"There's kind of a perverse incentive not to reclassify," said
Christopher Jepsen, who studies English learners as a research fellow at
the Public Policy Institute.
Critics say the system -- riddled with inconsistencies and set up poorly
for monitoring -- essentially cheats English learners of a proper
education.
"It's troubling," said Elisabeth Cutler, an analyst at the Oakland
nonprofit Education Trust-West, which advocates for improving minority
and English-learner education.
"Are
students being stuck in those EL programs so that they cannot really excel
in English classes?"
Different standards
While
voters approved a ballot measure in 1998 that severely restricted bilingual
education, the state continues to serve a large number of English language
learners with special classes, curriculum and instructional aides.
According to a June state audit, the department spent more than $630 million
in state and federal money in 2003-04 to supplement education for English
learners. They represent roughly a fifth of the state's 6 million students.
In
deciding who can be reclassified as mainstream, districts follow four state
guidelines. Students must pass a fluency test. Districts must also consider
scores from a separate standardized English exam and consult teachers and
parents.
Beyond
that, California schools may set the bar as high as they deem fit.
The
Pleasanton school district asks that students score at least proficient on
state English tests, one level beyond state requirements. Kindergartners in
the Antioch school district who do not test as fluent must stay in the
program until the end of third grade. The Mt. Diablo school district looks
at math and English test scores and demands a C-grade or better in class.
West Contra Costa students must write an essay.
Administrators say districts created these extra hoops because students who
pass as fluent on a bubble sheet do not always perform in trigonometry or
comparative literature.
"Sure
they're conversational," said Wayner Miller, Mt. Diablo's assistant director
of curriculum and instruction. "But can th! ey read and write anywhere near
grade level? No."
Students
who leave the program too soon risk floundering in mainstream classes, said
Carmen Garces, the Antioch school district's coordinator of English language
learner services.
"! In
the same way that they should not be taken out of math, they should not be
taken out of ELD," Garces said. "English is the basis of success in school."
Stuck
Policy
analysts point to a more systemic problem: Schools routinely neglect to move
students into more rigorous mainstream classes.
A Bureau
of State Audits report in June showed that 62 percent of 180 students
reviewed in eight school districts, including San Francisco, qualified for
reclassification but remained in English learner classes. Often districts do
not adhere to their own redesignation policies, the audit says.
"Although school districts generally appear to identify English learners
appropriately when they enroll new students," the audit reads, "they do not
do as good a job of ensuring that English learners who meet minimum school
district redesignation criteria are removed from the English learner
population."
At the
state level, the Department of Education does not monitor whether students
eligible for reclassification ever make it out of English-learner classes.
Schools do not document why students are not reclassified.
The
Legislative Analyst's Office reported last month that each year, the number
of students scoring low on the fluency test shrinks as the number scoring as
advanced increases. Essentially, there is a "build up" of capable students
among the ranks of English learners, said Paul Warren said, which helps
school districts meet achievement standards, said Paul Warren of the
Legislative Analyst's Office.
Local school
administrators bristled at the idea that they purposely would hold back
students to bring in cash, especially since English-learner services
generally cost more than districts receive from federal or state sources.
"To say
that we're getting too much money, it's just an outrageous assertion," said
Mt. Diablo's Miller.
Solutions come slowly
To solve
the problem of low reclassification rates, the state auditor's office
recommended creating a statewide standard for deciding when English learners
should switch to mainstream classes. The Legislative Analyst's Office said
the state should reward districts for improvements on fluency tests.
Another
option is to switch to a system like Arizona's, whe! re students either pass
the test and head to mainstream classes, or fail and stay English learners.
The problem is that no study shows whether students learn better when they
go to mainstream classes sooner or later.
"If
there were (data)," Warren said, "it would make life easier for policy
makers."
Shirley Dang covers education. Reach her at 510-262-2798 or
sdang@cctimes.com.
|