The Associated Press
04.17.2006
By Garance Burke
RAYMORE, Mo. — Myrna Dick is desperate for her young son to take a nap, so
she cajoles him with soft Spanish phrases.
"Vete a dormir, mijo," she says, telling Zachary to sleep as he
fumbles for Teddy Grahams. "Take the bear in your arms, and the two of you
go lie down."
It's a suburban life in a place that hosts fishing derbies and Easter egg
hunts and calls itself the "Garden Spot of the State." But it's a life that
Zachary, snug in his cornflower-colored jumpsuit, was very nearly denied.
In 2004, the government tried to deport Myrna Dick. It charged that she once
lied to gain entry to the United States, that she claimed she was an
American when she was in fact a Mexican.
But she was pregnant, and a federal judge in Missouri said her fetus
essentially was already an American citizen. He could not be deported, and
as a result, neither could she.
Until Zachary was born.
Then, immigration officials reasserted their claims. In February, a federal
appeals court gave immigration officials the right to bar the 31-year-old
mother from the United States for life, separating her from her son, now 17
months old, and her American husband.
This time, the family's case is attracting the attention of prominent
legislators who say it symbolizes the contradictions of the broken U.S.
immigration system. According to the Pew Hispanic Center, a research
organization in Washington, nearly 5 percent of U.S. families are headed by
illegal immigrants.
"Illegal immigration is deeply intertwined within our households and
communities," said former INS Commissioner Doris Meissner. "A family like
this is an illustration of literally millions of people in the country
today."
One of 20 children
Myrna was born in Chihuahua, Mexico, and grew up in Santa Barbara Tutuaca, a
mountain village of 3,000. Her father, Ramon Ochoa, told his 20 children
stories of picking string beans and onions in California's Central Valley,
where he traveled in the 1950s and 1960s under the United States' first
guest-worker program.
Two older sisters had left the family ranch in Santa Barbara to work in
Texas, and would come back periodically with their children to stock her
mother's grocery store.
"Our skin would be black from working outside," Myrna said, "and my nieces
would come in from America with their beautiful clothes and their dolls. … "
When Myrna, an epileptic, suffered from grand mal seizures, her father sold
everything, and the entire family moved to Texas so the 12-year-old could
get treatment.
They overstayed a temporary visa and settled illegally in Oakleaf, near
Dallas. Myrna spent much of the rest of school in the nurse's office,
learning English in fits and starts.
Myrna came to think of herself as a proud Texan. At work one night, she met
Brady Dick at the Dallas sports bar where she was a hostess. After a few
months of dating, they married in 2002; that same year, Brady submitted an
application for Myrna to become a U.S. resident by marriage.
But when she went to renew her work visa in spring 2004, the federal
government ordered her immediate deportation.
Officials say she lied
Everyone agrees that Myrna crossed the desert in 1998 after going to her
grandmother's funeral in Chihuahua. She said smugglers led her and another
woman for hours, and border agents found them on a deserted hill.
"It was all sand and bushes," Myrna said, crying as she told the story of
that crossing. "The wind lifted up the dirt. They caught us some place — I
don't even know where."
What's in dispute is what happened next.
Michael Sharma-Crawford, her lawyer, says Myrna never claimed she was a U.S.
citizen, but instead told officials she was attempting to enter the country
illegally. The government says when agents took her fingerprints, she told
them her name was Ivette Treviso-Frias (something she denies) and said she
was American.
That lie, the government says, makes her ineligible to ever live in America.
Six years later, the government reinstated the old deportation order under
Treviso-Frias' name to take Myrna into custody.
Statute taken "out of context"
Kris Kobach, who served as immigration adviser to former Attorney General
John Ash-croft, says the statute that made false claim to citizenship a
deportable offense was never intended to be applied years after the fact.
When it became law in 1996, he said it was intended to stop dangerous
criminals from coming across the border, not to deport a suburban mother.
"They're taking the statute out of context," said Kobach, a law professor at
the University of Missouri-Kansas City.
The Eighth Circuit will hear the Dicks' appeal in the next two months, said
Sharma-Crawford. If it fails there, he believes the case could proceed to
the U.S. Supreme Court. Meanwhile, several legislators are considering
introducing a special waiver that would grant some immigrants who made false
claims to citizenship the right to stay in the country.
For the moment, however, Myrna keeps waking up at night, imagining Zachary
has been taken.
She says she's seen other marriages fall apart over things like this and
tries to imagine how she and her husband could live apart, on two sides of
the border.
|