Arizona Republic, The (Phoenix, AZ)
- February 10, 2008
Author: Maurice Wolfthal,
Special for The Republic
Buried on Page A38 of the Dec. 9 The Arizona Republic was a tiny
article, "Fewer and Fewer in U.S. Read for Fun." But it reported a
major, national, long-range study by the National Endowment for the
Arts, which revealed that interest in reading is in
steep decline, paralleling a decline in reading
ability starting in the middle school years. This was not news to
me, having been a reading teacher and
reading specialist for many years. But it should have been
Page One news, and it should have been required reading
for educators. A few years ago, when I became the new librarian at a
high school south of Phoenix, I wanted to get some sense of the
reading interests of the students. So I distributed
a voluntary, anonymous survey to our students in Grades 9 through
12. I asked two questions: Is there a book that you have read on
your own that you would recommend to others? And if so, which book
was it?
I specified that the students should not write their names on the
survey, and that they should answer honestly. Of about 150 students
who responded, only 17 could recommend such a book. And of those who
did, many had to think back several years to their days in
elementary school, naming such books as Gary Paulsen's Hatchet and
Beverly Cleary's Ramona the Pest.
There are many reasons why few children read for pleasure. Here is a
list of factors that educators most commonly invoke: poor near
vision; dyslexia; second-language difficulties; access to
television, videos, computer games and other electronic
entertainments; parents who are themselves illiterate; parents who
do not have the time to take their children to the public library;
parents who do not have the money to take their children to
bookstores.
But what you will never hear is the part that the educational
establishment itself has played in the decline in reading
. Middle-school and high-school teachers are more and more compelled
to teach a narrowly-prescribed curriculum, often erroneously called
"best practices," which does not encourage children to read books on
their own level, independently, and at their own pace during the
school day. Language-arts time is devoted strictly to whole-class
lessons on literary analysis, vocabulary lists, exercises on
grammar, worksheets on usage, phonics drills, suffixes and prefixes,
and, of course, practice for whatever standardized test is currenly
in vogue. None of this, unfortunately, has any demonstrable impact
on reading ability.
Yet there is a wealth of research indicating that independent
reading is the single most important factor in
raising reading ability beyond the third-grade
level. Nevertheless it is clear that it is in part the fault of our
schools that most of our children do not consider reading
an important or pleasurable part of their lives. This state of
affairs is all the more ironic when one considers that school
districts commonly proclaim that their vision and mission include
the nurturing of "lifelong readers" or "lifelong learners."
Maurice Wolfthal has been a teacher and school librarian for 38
years. He can be reached at mwolfthal@yahoo.com.
Edition: Final Chaser
Section: VALLEY & State
Page: B4
Dateline: AZ
Record Number: pho95397580